-Disposable|Heroes-

inside a whale since 2003.
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:04 pm 
Offline
♥Prinny♥
♥Prinny♥
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 651
Gender: Female ♀
You don't see this being covered by any of the news media outlets, including Fox. One can only ask why.

This is a case regarding Obama's citizenship. The Plaintiff filed an official simple request to provide proof that he is a natural born citizen. Instead of coughing up the proof, or giving an answer to the request, the DNC filed a motion for a Protection Order from any discovery, but the court denied. Their failure to answer or object the request within 30 days, in accordance to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the precedent case of McNeil v. AT&T Universal Card F.R.D. 492, 494 (E.D. Pa. 2000), was then considered to be admittance.

Details in the current court document:

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/di ... 281573/27/

_________________
Image Image
siggy by Garyk19


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 5:32 pm 
Offline
Tarutaru Murder Suspect
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:07 pm
Posts: 995
Location: The land of a million galka...
Gender: Male ♂
IGNs: Floressa, Yururu, Cheetah, Donorise
Interesting find. Did you hear about this via a site or a friend?
Let's see what happens.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 5:03 pm 
Offline
The Incredible Edible Zephie!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 147
Location: The Planet from outer SPAAAAAAAAAACE
Update:

October 24, 2008 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND SENATOR BARACK OBAMA TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 20) IS GRANTED; DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (DOC. NO. 24) IS GRANTED; AND PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUCTIVE RELIEF IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 10/24/08. 10/27/08 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES AND E-MAILED AND FAXED FROM CHAMBERS. (jpd)

In other words, since the plaintiff didn't have anything at stake and was making an accusation without collateral, the entire trial has been nullified.

This trial is done.




SUPER IMPORTANT EDIT:

This still doesn't mean the question has been answered - the law says -

December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986If, at the time of your birth, both your parents were U.S. citizens and at least one had a prior residence in the United States, you automatically acquired U.S. citizenship with no conditions for retaining it.

If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. There are no conditions placed on retaining this type of citizenship. If your one U.S. citizen parent is your father and you were born outside of marriage, the same rules apply if your father legally legitimated you before your 21st birthday and you were unmarried at the time. If legitimation occurred after November 14, 1986, your father must have established paternity prior to your 18th birthday, either by acknowledgment or by court order, and must have stated in writing that he would support you financially until your 18th birthday.




Obama's mom had him at the age of 18. If Obama produces his original birth certificate, this would all be thrown under the rug; but it hasn't yet. After Obama went to "go see his dying grandmother who wouldn't see election day" without his family, the Governor of Hawaii said, "No" to releasing the original Certification of Live Birth.

Why won't he produce it when prompted? This is fishy, really fishy. Smells of rotten corpses and plenty of skeletons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:54 am 
Offline
Dangerous
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:26 pm
Posts: 201
Location: Etheria
Gender: Male ♂
IGNs: Gay Fenrir owner
ZephieCakes wrote:
Smells of rotten corpses.


"I'm John McCain and I resemble that remark."

*cackles and runs off* >.>

_________________
My feel for you boy, is decaying right in front of me
Like the carrion of a murdered prey
And all I want is to save you, honey
Or the strength to walk away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:23 am
Posts: 74
Location: Pa
Gender: Male ♂
IGNs: Akamahou - Red Magic
It does seem really fishy. If he has nothing "more" to hide, he should just show it and get it over with.

Lol@ Kyl

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:51 am
Posts: 542
Gender: Male ♂
IGNs: Daymon, Damien
obviously the Mccain campaign team got hold of that birth certificate first and burned it.

was obama's mother born in the US? If so then this is all a waste of time

_________________
Life's for the living so live it or you're better off dead.\
PSN ID: Daymos256
Steam: Daymos256


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:59 am 
Offline
The Incredible Edible Zephie!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 147
Location: The Planet from outer SPAAAAAAAAAACE
Not necessarily; Obama was born when his mother was eighteen. The law of the day required you to be a resident of this country for at least 5 years AFTER turning 16 in order to qualify your child to be a citizen. Of course it's relevant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:19 am 
Offline
♥Prinny♥
♥Prinny♥
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 651
Gender: Female ♀
Wrong, 5 years after turning 14. Still, 5+14 = 19, and since she was 18....

_________________
Image Image
siggy by Garyk19


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:18 pm 
Offline
The Incredible Edible Zephie!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:21 pm
Posts: 147
Location: The Planet from outer SPAAAAAAAAAACE
Update: Berg will be filing an injunction at the US Supreme Court to "stay" the election.



"Philip J. Berg Will Be Arriving U.S. Supreme Court, Washington, DC at 3:15 p.m. today to file for an Injunction to Stay Presidential Election Pending Writ of Certiorari regarding Obama who is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States

(Press Release - 10/30/08 - Contact information and pdf of press release at bottom)



(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/30/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he will
be at the United States Supreme Court today, October 30, 2008 to file:

1. Application to Justice Souter for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008; and
2. Writ of Certiorari.

Berg stated, “I am hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will grant the Injunction pending a review of this case to avoid a Constitutional Crisis by insisting that Obama produce certified documentation that he is or is not a “natural born” citizen and if he cannot produce documentation that Obama be removed from the ballot for President.

Berg’s case, Berg vs. Obama was dismissed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket # 08-cv-4083 for lack of standing. This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said."

[Source Document]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BERG v. OBAMA
PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:06 pm 
Offline
Tarutaru Murder Suspect
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:07 pm
Posts: 995
Location: The land of a million galka...
Gender: Male ♂
IGNs: Floressa, Yururu, Cheetah, Donorise
ZephieCakes wrote:
What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

I wouldnt get too worked up Zeph. Politicians are all the same 8-)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group